'No defects' in crashed jet

Here's a hint. When a passenger plane skids off the runway and bursts into flames, there's a defect, even if it's minor. Maybe the defect is sitting behind the wheel, or lever, or whatever it is pilots use to make the plane go.

Canadian investigators announced on Wednesday they had found no "significant anomalies" in the mechanical systems of an Air France jet, Flight 358, that crash-landed at Toronto Airport in August. What the fuck is a "significant anomaly"? That makes me want to get on a plane. Who makes the decision whether an anomaly is significant or not? I don't trust the guy at the Burger King drive-through, I'm supposed to trust some guy to decide whether the cable leaking some kind of liquid on the wing is significant or not?

Luckily no one was hurt as all 297 passengers and 12 crew escaped from the Airbus A340-313, or, as they affectionately now call it, the flying blazing deathtrap. For now, I'm keeping my feet on the ground. And I'm carrying a parachute just in case.